| Name | CVE-2017-7275 |
| Description | The ReadPCXImage function in coders/pcx.c in ImageMagick 7.0.4.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (attempted large memory allocation and application crash) via a crafted file. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-8862 and CVE-2016-8866. |
| Source | CVE (at NVD; CERT, LWN, oss-sec, fulldisc, Red Hat, Ubuntu, Gentoo, SUSE bugzilla/CVE, GitHub advisories/code/issues, web search, more) |
| Debian Bugs | 859025 |
Vulnerable and fixed packages
The table below lists information on source packages.
| Source Package | Release | Version | Status |
|---|
| imagemagick (PTS) | jessie, jessie (lts) | 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u27 | vulnerable |
| stretch (security) | 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u14 | vulnerable |
| stretch (lts), stretch | 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u20 | vulnerable |
| buster, buster (lts) | 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u9 | vulnerable |
| buster (security) | 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u7 | vulnerable |
| bullseye | 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3+deb11u4 | vulnerable |
| bullseye (security) | 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.3+deb11u3 | vulnerable |
| bookworm | 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6+deb12u2 | vulnerable |
| bookworm (security) | 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6+deb12u1 | vulnerable |
| sid, trixie | 8:7.1.1.39+dfsg1-3 | vulnerable |
The information below is based on the following data on fixed versions.
| Package | Type | Release | Fixed Version | Urgency | Origin | Debian Bugs |
|---|
| imagemagick | source | (unstable) | (unfixed) | unimportant | | 859025 |
Notes
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/03/27/imagemagick-memory-allocation-failure-in-acquiremagickmemory-memory-c-incomplete-fix-for-cve-2016-8862-and-cve-2016-8866/
https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/271
Furthermore: upstream is not able to reproduce the problem as well
The problem result in a memory allocation issue when compiled with ASAN
but unreproducible from unstream. Since no more details can be provided
and the issue not addressed, treat this as "non-issue" (and thus marked
unimportant). If in future details can be elaborated by the reporter
we might re-evaluate this entry.